Posts Tagged ‘party’
In reading my latest non-fiction conquest and 848-page blunt object, I noticed one similarity among presidents since Reconstruction. Most of the really effective presidents, and all of their really effective cabinet members, were involved with politics from an early age.
If I listed all the presidents who canvassed for, stumped for or simply outspokenly supported presidential nominees from an earlier age, I’d have quite a list. Benjamin Harrison for Ulysses Grant, Theodore Roosevelt for Benjamin Harrison. Franklin Roosevelt for Al Smith and, funnily enough, the same Roosevelt for Herbert Hoover a decade before Hoover took office, and 12 years before Franklin whomped Hoover’s pasty Quaker, Chinese-fluent buttocks.
However, It takes dedication and self-sacrifice to get ahead, just as much as political opportunism. William Taft three times turned down his dream job — Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, which he much later earned — from T.R. so he could finish up his current job.
If I’m going to amount to anything in life, I should take these examples of model citzenship, and get active. Lacking a better idiom, I need to get fired up and ready to go — a simple interest, however active, is not enough.
Hopping over to another side — I’ll vote third party this year — isn’t new to me. I went door-to-door for Bush in 2004, but that was more because I got paid $75 than because I believed anything he or Kerry believed in. Either candidate has but to ask, and I’m on the mailing lists for both candidates.
Both ask for cash. Obama more often asks for help.
Looks like I’ll be going to Camp Obama.
Women have a unique, all purpose ad hominem redirect that most women choose not to use, and yet one we see all too often — “You’re sexist,” or, more specifically, “You attack me because I’m a woman, you sexist.” We saw this in all varieties earlier this year. To name two: we saw it covertly, from the Hillary Clinton campaign; overtly, from her supporters.
Former Bush administration rouge Monica Goodling brought another spin on the same formula. She implied that she was attacked because she was a woman, yet did it without saying a word. All she had to do was start acting in the manner of an attacked woman, or at least act like the exact stereotype of an attacked woman.
Stephen Colbert took it at face value. From the same excellent episode of The Colbert Report that brought us the Three-Card Monte game that explained high oil prices, we have also this very funny segment that sums up the incident nicely:
For television, this is a remarkably deep look at what isn’t even the most recent scandal at the highest levels of our incumbent administration. Naturally, there have been deeper analyses of Monica Goodling’s testimony, but Colbert is, as always, going for the laugh. If he makes his viewers thoughtful, all the better.
I was pretty thoughtful for a good five minutes. I think that throwing Monica Goodling to the wolves was meant as all-purpose damage control.
She wasn’t blamed for the improper hiring and firing of federal attorneys just because she’s an expendable woman, but more precisely because the blamers that be knew she could use her femininity to her advantage. As Slate notes, she was in full damsel in distress mode during the hearing, and most of the panel fell for it, hook, line and sinker.
Party-line Democrats who weren’t watching closely had already joined her side because she had appeared to be yet another woman scapegoated in the tradition of Eve. Note that the “You can’t blame me because I’m a woman” defense is only credible if we already believe that women are frequently scapegoated.
It’s a bitter irony that we’re all the more susceptible to Goodling’s innocent girl performance only because we rightly acknowledge that witch hunts still exist.